November, 2026 - AttendeeGain

Cvent vs Swoogo: which event platform fits your team

Cvent vs Swoogo (2026): Which Event Platform Fits Your Team?

Cvent vs Swoogo: the short answer

Cvent vs Swoogo is a choice between enterprise breadth and registration-led flexibility.

Choose Cvent when you need the whole event lifecycle in one contract: venue sourcing, hotel room blocks, native virtual production and governance across a large team. Choose Swoogo when registration is the heart of your events and you want flexible logic, predictable pricing and fast, human support without enterprise overhead.

The two are not really rivals for the same buyer. Cvent is built to run an organisation’s entire meetings and events operation. Swoogo is built to make registration, event websites and onsite check-in fast and flexible, and it leaves venue sourcing and video streaming to other tools.

We build events on both. This guide covers what the feature lists leave out: what each one costs a real team, how long it takes to get the first event live, and where each one will frustrate you.

Cvent vs Swoogo at a glance

	Cvent	Swoogo
Best fit	Enterprise programmes across every format and department	Registration-led conference, field and internal event programmes
Pricing	Quote only; Professional and Enterprise editions	Professional from US$11,800 a year; Enterprise is custom
Events and registrations	Depends on licensed modules	Unlimited events and registrations on every plan
Users	Professional includes 15 user logins	Professional includes 1 full user and 1 reporting user
Venue sourcing	Yes: supplier network, RFPs, Passkey room blocks	No; hotel block management only
Virtual events	Native: Attendee Hub, Cvent Studio, plus ON24 and Goldcast	Event Hub with your own streaming provider (Zoom, Vimeo, ON24 and others)
Onsite check-in	OnArrival kit or fully staffed OnArrival 360	Go Onsite included; Go Onsite Pro adds kiosk mode
Mobile attendee app	Attendee Hub	Go Attend, an add-on
Integrations	Long native list, priced as a module	30+ integrations with no extra integration fees
Support	24/7, 1,800+ client services team	In-house, first response within 15 minutes in business hours

Cvent vs Swoogo feature-by-feature

Registration

This is the closest contest. Cvent handles complex attendee paths with enterprise governance built in: approvals routed through managers, housing and travel captured in the same flow, and a long list of CRM connectors. Swoogo’s strength is unlimited conditional logic at the field, page and path level, plus progressive registration that collects details over time. In practice, a planner can build surprisingly complex Swoogo flows without help, while the equivalent Cvent build usually needs an experienced operator.

Event websites

Both offer drag-and-drop builders with custom CSS and HTML. Swoogo’s sites are white-labelled on every plan and it lists 40+ widgets and 12+ themes. Cvent’s Site Designer goes further with custom code, but takes longer to master. If brand control matters and your team is small, Swoogo is quicker to a finished site.

Venue sourcing and room blocks

Cvent wins outright. Its supplier network lets planners send RFPs to many venues and compare bids, and Passkey manages hotel room blocks with real-time pickup. Swoogo has no venue sourcing; it manages hotel inventory inside registration, but sourcing happens elsewhere.

Virtual and hybrid

Cvent produces virtual events natively through Attendee Hub and Cvent Studio, and added ON24 and Goldcast in 2025. Swoogo’s Event Hub is a branded virtual space, but the video comes from a streaming provider you already use. That is a strength if you like your provider and a gap if you want one vendor for everything.

Onsite check-in

Swoogo includes its Go Onsite check-in app on every plan, with offline check-in; kiosk mode is in the paid Pro upgrade. Cvent’s OnArrival ranges from a self-service hardware kit to a fully staffed service, and Cvent also sells trade-show lead capture and meeting scheduling as add-ons. For a single conference, Swoogo is simpler. For trade shows with exhibitor lead capture, Cvent covers more.

Integrations and data

Swoogo lists 30+ integrations plus a REST API and webhooks, with no extra integration fees. Cvent’s native list is longer and includes connectors that regulated industries rely on, but integrations are a priced module. If you need a life-sciences or travel connector, check Cvent’s list; if you need Salesforce, HubSpot or Marketo, both are covered.

Cvent vs Swoogo pricing: what you will actually pay

Swoogo publishes a price; Cvent does not. But Swoogo’s number needs reading carefully.

Swoogo Professional is listed at US$11,800 a year with one full user and one reporting user, unlimited events, unlimited registrations, the check-in app and 30+ integrations. Pricing is per user, and the page estimates cost by team size, so a team with several builders will pay more than the headline. Enterprise is custom and adds advanced logic, SSO, a customer success manager and a 99.9% uptime SLA. Paid upgrades include Go Onsite Pro, mobile event apps, premium support, pro services, extra domains, SSO, sub-accounts and Call for Speakers.

Cvent is quote only, with a Professional edition (choose modules, 15 user logins) and an Enterprise edition (Registration, Attendee Hub, OnArrival and Essentials included, with API and SSO). Venue sourcing, Passkey, lead capture, Jifflenow, Surveys and Webinar Premium are extras, as are services such as OnArrival 360 and Event Build.

Cost line to ask about	Cvent	Swoogo
Platform licence	Quote, by edition and modules	From US$11,800/yr (Professional)
More builders on the team	Professional includes 15 logins	Priced per additional user
Attendee mobile app	Attendee Hub, by edition	Go Attend add-on
Kiosk check-in	OnArrival	Go Onsite Pro add-on
Integrations	Integrations module	Included, no extra fees
SSO	Enterprise edition	Add-on or Enterprise
Streaming	Native options	Your own provider’s fees

Whichever you shortlist, get a year-one quote for your real calendar: number of builders, number of events, onsite needs and the streaming setup. For a small team running many events, Swoogo’s model is usually easier to predict. For a large organisation with many users across departments, the comparison can tilt the other way.

Cvent vs Swoogo implementation and support

Swoogo says you can build your first event in a day, and its support is in-house with a first response within 15 minutes during business hours. On G2, as quoted on Swoogo’s own comparison page in July 2026, Swoogo scored 9.7 for ease of use against Cvent’s 7.8, and 9.9 for quality of support against Cvent’s 8.7. Treat vendor-published scores with care, but the direction matches what most users report.

Cvent has a 24/7 client services team of more than 1,800 people and a formal training and certification programme through Cvent Academy. That depth exists because the platform is deep. Many teams buy implementation or event-build services for their first events, or bring in a partner.

Where teams typically struggle:

Swoogo: assuming the headline price covers the whole team; discovering late that the attendee app and kiosk check-in are upgrades; planning a virtual event without budgeting for a streaming provider.
Cvent: building registration before agreeing attendee types and approval rules; under-estimating how long integrations take to map and test; paying for modules nobody on the team has been trained to use.

	Cvent	Swoogo
Who runs it day to day	A trained operator	An event planner or coordinator
First event live	Weeks, with services or a partner	Swoogo says a first event can be built in a day
Support model	24/7, tiered by what you buy	In-house, 15-minute first response in business hours

Sponsors and exhibitors

Cvent is built for trade shows and large exhibitor programmes. Exhibitor management is in the Professional edition, and LeadCapture, iCapture, Appointments and Jifflenow add lead scanning, lead qualification and scheduled meetings as separately priced modules.

Swoogo covers the sponsor basics well: customisable sponsor pages, tailored sponsor registration and communications, 1:1 meetings, reports on individual attendee interactions, and sponsor spotlighting across events. It does not offer a dedicated trade-show lead-capture product on the scale of Cvent’s.

For a conference with a dozen sponsors, Swoogo is enough. For an expo with hundreds of exhibitors scanning badges, Cvent is the safer choice.

AI features in 2026

Cvent launched CventIQ in June 2025: 20+ AI features including AI-assisted venue RFP proposals, writing help, personalised session recommendations, live transcripts and feedback summaries. The Goldcast acquisition added AI video repurposing.
Swoogo launched an MCP server in March 2026 that lets AI assistants such as Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini query live event data in plain language, for example “which companies have the most registrants?”, and make some event updates. Rule-based automations for session assignment and registrant updates are included in Professional.

Cvent’s AI is broader and built into its own screens. Swoogo’s approach is to plug event data into the AI tools your team already uses.

Cvent vs Swoogo security and compliance

	Cvent	Swoogo
SOC 2 Type II	Yes	Yes
ISO 27001 and 27701	Yes	Yes
PCI DSS	Yes	Level 1
SSO	Enterprise edition	Add-on or Enterprise
Multi-factor authentication	Enterprise edition	Included
Uptime SLA	Ask in your contract	99.9%, Enterprise plan

Both clear standard enterprise procurement. Regulated industries should ask Cvent about its additional certifications and life-sciences integrations such as Veeva.

Reliability

Swoogo’s Enterprise plan includes a 99.9% uptime SLA backed by compensation. Cvent does not publish an SLA figure on its pricing page; ask for it in writing. Bizzabo, a competitor of both, has published a claim that Cvent had about seven weeks of partial outages or degraded performance in the first half of 2025. Treat that as a competitor’s reading of Cvent’s public status page, and check both vendors’ status histories for the months your events run.

Switching between Cvent and Swoogo

Attendee data, contacts and past reports export from either platform; registration paths, websites, email templates and integrations are rebuilt. Moving from Cvent to Swoogo usually means finding a new home for venue sourcing, hotel blocks and virtual production. Moving from Swoogo to Cvent usually means more training and more time per build, in exchange for more capability. Switch between event seasons and run one event in parallel before closing the old account.

Cvent vs Swoogo: which should you choose?

Your situation	Better fit	Why
You source venues or manage hotel blocks at scale	Cvent	Supplier network and Passkey; Swoogo has no equivalent
Registration logic is complex and changes often	Swoogo	Unlimited conditional logic a planner can manage
Small team running many events a year	Swoogo	Unlimited events on a predictable per-user price
Large organisation, many departments and users	Cvent	Governance, budgets, approvals, 15+ logins in Professional
Virtual-first programme wanting one vendor	Cvent	Native production and webinar line-up
You already pay for Zoom or another streaming tool	Swoogo	Event Hub wraps the provider you have
Trade shows with exhibitor lead capture	Cvent	Lead capture and meeting scheduling add-ons
Responsive support is the deciding factor	Swoogo	In-house team, 15-minute first response

One more option teams overlook: some organisations run both, with Cvent for sourcing and large conferences and Swoogo for fast, frequent field events. That only makes sense if the data can be joined up in your CRM, so plan the integrations first.

Cvent vs Swoogo FAQs

Is Swoogo cheaper than Cvent? Usually for small and mid-sized teams. Swoogo Professional starts at US$11,800 a year with unlimited events, while Cvent quotes every deal. The comparison changes as you add Swoogo users and upgrades, so price your real team.

Does Swoogo do venue sourcing? No. Swoogo manages hotel blocks within registration but has no venue marketplace or RFP tool. Cvent’s supplier network is its biggest structural advantage.

Can Swoogo run virtual events? Yes, through its Event Hub, but the live video comes from a streaming provider you connect, such as Zoom or Vimeo. Cvent has native virtual production.

Which is easier to use? Swoogo, by most accounts. Cvent’s depth is why it runs a formal certification programme.

Is the Swoogo mobile app included? The Go Onsite check-in app is included on every plan. The Go Attend attendee app is a paid upgrade.

Can we use both Cvent and Swoogo? Some organisations do, splitting sourcing and flagship events from frequent smaller ones. It works only if both feed the same CRM cleanly.

Sources: Cvent pricing, Swoogo pricing, Swoogo vs competitors, ZoomInfo: Cvent vs Swoogo.

Need help deciding?

We build on both Cvent and Swoogo. Talk to our team about your event calendar and we will tell you which platform fits, or how to get more out of the one you already have. See our Cvent expertise and Swoogo expertise pages, or compare options on our event registration platforms and onsite solutions pages.

Cvent vs Swoogo (2026): Which Event Platform Fits Your Team? Read More »

Bizzabo vs Swoogo: event experience OS or registration workhorse

Bizzabo vs Swoogo (2026): Event Experience OS or Registration Workhorse?

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Bizzabo vs Swoogo: the short answer

Bizzabo vs Swoogo is a choice between a better room and a better registration form.

Choose Bizzabo if the onsite experience is the point: networking, sponsor leads and engagement data, especially with its Klik SmartBadge wearables. Choose Swoogo if registration is the point: complex, branching forms, frequent events and a team that wants to build everything itself without paying for hardware it will not use.

Both sit in the same middle ground. They are more capable than ticketing tools like Eventbrite, and neither offers Cvent-style venue sourcing. Both include unlimited events and registrations. The difference is where each one puts its depth: Bizzabo at the event itself, Swoogo at the form the attendee fills in before they arrive.

We build on both. Below, we check each vendor’s claims against the other’s published pricing, because some of what you will read online does not hold up.

Bizzabo vs Swoogo at a glance

	Bizzabo	Swoogo
Built for	B2B marketing teams running flagship conferences	Event producers who own registration and the event website
Published price	$499 per user per month, billed annually, 3-user minimum ($17,999 a year)	Professional US$11,800 a year; Enterprise custom
Users at that price	3	1 full user and 1 reporting user
Events and registrations	Unlimited	Unlimited
Signature strength	Klik SmartBadge networking and lead capture	Unlimited conditional logic on every plan
Attendee mobile app	Included; custom-branded app is an add-on	Go Attend, an add-on
Check-in app	Onsite Command App listed in the core plan; Advanced Onsite is an add-on	Go Onsite included; Go Onsite Pro is an add-on
CRM and martech integrations	Add-on	30+ integrations included
Virtual production	Streaming studio, simulive, breakout rooms	Event Hub plus your own streaming provider
Venue sourcing	No	No

Bizzabo vs Swoogo feature-by-feature

Registration and event websites

This is Swoogo’s home ground. Unlimited conditional logic runs across forms, emails and web pages on every plan, so one question can show or hide a dozen later fields, and different attendee types can see different content on the same site. Bizzabo’s registration flows, ticketing and website builder are capable and fast to stand up, and its advanced registration flows are in the core plan. For a typical B2B conference, both work. For forms that branch on many variables, Swoogo is the safer bet.

Onsite, badging and Klik

This is where they split. Swoogo’s Go Onsite check-in app is included, with offline check-in; Go Onsite Pro adds kiosk mode. Bizzabo offers check-in through its Onsite Command App, rentable Bizzabox kits and technicians, plus Klik SmartBadge wearables. Klik lets attendees swap contact details with a tap, lets exhibitors capture leads without a scanner, and shows organisers which sessions and booths drew a crowd. Swoogo has nothing equivalent.

Networking and matchmaking

Bizzabo has two layers: Klik for casual tap-based introductions, and a Networking add-on for 1:1 scheduling and smart matchmaking. Swoogo supports 1:1 and one-to-many meetings and integrated chat, but structured matchmaking is lighter. If matchmaking is a hard requirement, test it on Swoogo before you sign.

Virtual and hybrid

Bizzabo includes a streaming studio with simulive sessions and breakout rooms, and sells a fuller Virtual Event Experience as an add-on. Swoogo’s Event Hub gives virtual attendees a branded space, with video from your own provider. Choose Bizzabo if you want one vendor running the production; choose Swoogo if you already have a streaming tool you like.

Integrations

Swoogo includes 30+ integrations in Professional, with no integration fees. Bizzabo lists martech and CRM integrations, including HubSpot, Marketo, Salesforce MCAE and Eloqua, as a paid add-on. If CRM sync is essential, Swoogo’s headline price is closer to the real price.

Bizzabo vs Swoogo pricing: the numbers worked out

Both vendors publish real prices, which is rare in this category. But “unlimited” means unlimited events and registrations, not unlimited users.

Bizzabo charges $499 per user per month, billed annually, with a minimum of three users. Because the per-user rate is public, you can work out the base licence for any team size:

Team size	Bizzabo base licence per year
3 users (minimum)	$17,999 (Bizzabo’s stated figure)
5 users	about $29,940
10 users	about $59,880

Add-ons then sit on top: martech and CRM integrations, sponsor and speaker portals, networking, a custom-branded app, API access, SSO, branding, Advanced Onsite, virtual production and Klik.

Swoogo Professional is US$11,800 a year and includes one full user and one reporting user. Swoogo prices extra users on request and does not publish the per-user rate, so a five-person team should expect a higher number and ask for a written quote. Upgrades include Go Onsite Pro, the Go Attend app, premium support, pro services, extra domains, SSO, sub-accounts and Call for Speakers.

A claim to check. Swoogo’s comparison page says Bizzabo charges per registration plus setup, integration and support fees. Bizzabo’s own pricing page lists unlimited registrations in its base plan. On Bizzabo’s current published pricing, the per-registration claim does not hold, though its integration add-on is real. Ask both vendors to put their fee structure in writing.

Cost line to ask about	Bizzabo	Swoogo
Extra team members	$499 per user per month	Priced on request
CRM integrations	Add-on	Included
Attendee app	Included; branded app is an add-on	Go Attend add-on
Kiosk or advanced onsite	Advanced Onsite add-on, Bizzabox rental	Go Onsite Pro add-on
Wearables	Klik, quoted per event	Not offered
SSO	Add-on	Add-on or Enterprise

Bizzabo vs Swoogo implementation and support

Bizzabo includes a structured onboarding plan, a dedicated Event Success Specialist, pre- and post-event success calls and 24/7 support. It says new customers typically drive registration to their sites and apps within two months. The heaviest work is deciding which add-ons your programme needs before the first event, not after.

Swoogo says a first event can be built in a day, and its in-house support promises a first response within 15 minutes in business hours. The heaviest work is designing conditional logic up front: mapping who sees which question, page and email before anyone starts building.

On G2, as published by Swoogo in July 2026, Swoogo scored 9.7 for ease of use against Bizzabo’s 8.6, and 9.9 for quality of support against 8.9. Both are strong; Swoogo leads on both measures.

What stalls rollouts:

Bizzabo: CRM sync, SSO or Klik discovered as extras after signing; Klik ordered too late for the event date.
Swoogo: a team of four signing a two-seat plan; logic built page by page without a plan, so later changes break earlier branches.

Sponsors and exhibitors

Bizzabo includes lead management, sponsored sessions and app branding in the core plan, sells a sponsor portal as an add-on, and has Klik for tap-based lead capture and booth-traffic data. For sponsor-heavy conferences, that combination is hard to beat.

Swoogo offers customisable sponsor pages, tailored sponsor registration and communications, 1:1 meetings and reports on individual attendee interactions. It is solid for sponsor logistics but has nothing like Klik for capturing leads on the show floor.

AI features in 2026

Bizzabo has an organiser assistant, Event OS Copilot (November 2024), and an attendee assistant, Bizzy (April 2026), which answers questions about sessions, speakers and logistics. Matchmaking uses registration and engagement data.
Swoogo launched an MCP server in March 2026 so AI assistants such as Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini can query live event data and make some updates. Rule-based automations are included in Professional.

Bizzabo puts AI in front of attendees; Swoogo puts event data in front of your team’s AI tools.

Bizzabo vs Swoogo security and compliance

	Bizzabo	Swoogo
SOC 2 Type II	Yes	Yes
ISO 27001	Yes	Yes, plus ISO 27701
PCI DSS	Not listed on its pricing page	Level 1
GDPR and CCPA	Yes	Yes
Organiser SSO	Add-on	Add-on or Enterprise
Uptime SLA	Ask in your contract	99.9%, Enterprise plan

Reliability

Bizzabo publishes a 99.99% uptime figure for the first half of 2025 on its own comparison page. Swoogo’s Enterprise plan carries a 99.9% uptime SLA with compensation. A published figure and a contractual SLA are different things, so ask Bizzabo whether its figure is backed by an SLA in your contract, and ask Swoogo whether its SLA applies on Professional.

Switching between Bizzabo and Swoogo

Data moves; builds do not. Moving from Bizzabo to Swoogo means rebuilding registration with conditional logic, which is usually an upgrade, and deciding what replaces Klik. Bizzabo says Klik works with third-party platforms, so keeping it for a flagship event is an option. Moving from Swoogo to Bizzabo means checking that every branch of your current forms can be rebuilt, and pricing the add-ons you will need.

Bizzabo vs Swoogo: which should you choose?

Your situation	Better fit	Why
Networking and sponsor leads are the main KPI	Bizzabo	Klik wearables and the Networking add-on
Registration forms branch on many answers	Swoogo	Unlimited conditional logic on every plan
A few flagship conferences, run by marketing	Bizzabo	Built around the onsite experience
Many smaller events, run by one or two producers	Swoogo	Two seats and unlimited events from US$11,800
CRM sync must be in the base price	Swoogo	30+ integrations included
One vendor for virtual production	Bizzabo	Built-in streaming studio
You need venue sourcing or room blocks at scale	Neither	Look at Cvent

If you are torn, decide which part of the event you are actually trying to fix: the form attendees fill in, or the room they walk into.

Bizzabo vs Swoogo FAQs

Is Swoogo cheaper than Bizzabo? For small teams, usually. Swoogo starts at US$11,800 a year for two seats; Bizzabo starts at $17,999 a year for three. As the team grows, Bizzabo’s cost is easy to calculate from its public rate, while Swoogo’s extra seats need a quote.

Does Bizzabo charge per registration? Not on its current published pricing, which includes unlimited events and registrations. Its add-ons, such as CRM integrations and Klik, are where costs rise.

Does Swoogo have anything like Klik? No. Swoogo’s onsite layer is the Go Onsite check-in app, with a Pro upgrade for kiosk mode.

Which has better registration logic? Swoogo. Unlimited conditional logic across forms, emails and pages is its core strength.

Do either of them do venue sourcing? No. For venue sourcing and hotel room blocks at scale, Cvent is the main option.

Can I buy either one for a single event? Both sell annual subscriptions. Bizzabo states it requires an annual subscription.

Sources: Bizzabo pricing, Swoogo pricing, Swoogo vs Bizzabo, Bizzabo: Cvent vs Bizzabo.

Need help deciding?

We build on Bizzabo and Swoogo. Talk to our team and we will help you price your real team size and pick the platform that fits. See our Bizzabo expertise and Swoogo expertise pages, or explore our event registration platforms and onsite solutions pages.

Bizzabo vs Swoogo (2026): Event Experience OS or Registration Workhorse? Read More »

Cvent vs Bizzabo: an implementation partner comparison

Cvent vs Bizzabo (2026): An Implementation Partner’s Honest Comparison

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Cvent vs Bizzabo: the short answer

Cvent vs Bizzabo is really a question of how your organisation runs events, not which tool has more features.

Choose Cvent when events are an operation: many events a year, venue sourcing, hotel room blocks, approval workflows and several departments sharing one system. Choose Bizzabo when events are a marketing channel: a smaller number of B2B conferences where attendee experience, networking and fast setup matter more than procurement depth.

Most Cvent vs Bizzabo articles online are written by a third vendor trying to sell you something else. This one is written by a team that builds events on both platforms for clients. We have no reason to push you toward either, only toward the one that will still feel like the right call a year after you sign.

Here is how to read the rest of this guide. If you already know your event type, jump to the “Which should you choose?” section. If cost is the question, start with pricing. If you have been burned by a slow rollout before, read the implementation section first.

Cvent vs Bizzabo at a glance

	Cvent	Bizzabo
Best fit	Enterprise event programs across departments, formats and regions	B2B marketing teams running conferences and field events
Pricing model	Quote only; Professional and Enterprise editions	$499 per user per month, billed annually, 3-user minimum (from $17,999 a year)
Events included	Depends on the licensed modules	Unlimited events and registrations
Venue sourcing and room blocks	Yes: Cvent Supplier Network and Passkey	Room block management only; no venue marketplace
Onsite check-in	OnArrival: kiosks, on-demand badges, session check-in	Onsite Command App, Bizzabox rental kits, Klik SmartBadge wearables
Mobile app	Attendee Hub	Mobile app in the core plan; custom-branded app is an add-on
CRM and martech	Salesforce, Marketo, HubSpot, Dynamics, Eloqua and more	HubSpot, Marketo, Salesforce MCAE, Eloqua and more, sold as an add-on
API and SSO	Included in Enterprise edition	Add-ons
Webinars	Cvent Webinar, plus ON24 and Goldcast after 2025 acquisitions	Built-in streaming studio, simulive, breakout rooms
Learning curve	Steep; Cvent runs formal certification	Shorter; structured onboarding for every customer

Cvent vs Bizzabo feature-by-feature: where each platform is stronger

Registration

Cvent handles registration logic that gets complicated fast: many attendee types, approval workflows, group registration, housing and travel captured in the same path. If your event needs “VIPs skip payment, staff need manager approval, partners book hotel rooms in the same form”, Cvent does it natively.

Bizzabo’s registration flows are cleaner to build and faster for attendees, with advanced flows included in the core plan. It covers most B2B conference needs well. Where teams hit limits is very unusual logic or bulk edits across many ticket types.

Event websites

Both give you a no-code website builder with room for custom code. In our builds, Cvent’s Site Designer can be pushed a long way with custom HTML, CSS and JavaScript, but it takes experience to do it without breaking the registration path. Bizzabo is quicker to get to a polished page. Cvent rewards a skilled builder; Bizzabo rewards a small team on a deadline.

Mobile app and engagement

Cvent’s Attendee Hub is broad: personalised agendas, chat, Q&A, polls, gamification and exhibitor activation. Bizzabo’s app is included in the core plan and leans into networking, especially when paired with Klik SmartBadge wearables, which let attendees swap details with a tap and give organisers live movement data.

Onsite check-in and badging

This is where events are won or lost at the door. Cvent’s OnArrival offers kiosk self check-in, on-demand badge printing and session check-in, with a self-service kit or a fully staffed service. Bizzabo offers an Onsite Command App in the core plan, rentable Bizzabox kits, technician support and Klik. On both platforms, the hardware and staffing are a separate line on the quote. See our onsite solutions.

Integrations

Cvent’s integration list is longer and its Salesforce connector is the more mature of the two, which matters when events feed campaign attribution. Bizzabo connects to the major CRMs and marketing automation tools, but those connectors are a paid add-on, as are API access and SSO. Check exactly which connectors are in your quote before you sign. We cover this in our platform integration work.

Virtual events and webinars

Bizzabo has native streaming, simulive sessions and breakout rooms in the core plan. Cvent now has the broader webinar line-up after acquiring ON24 and Goldcast in 2025. Analysts have questioned how quickly those acquired products will feel like one platform, so test the specific webinar workflow you need, not the brochure.

Venue sourcing and room blocks

This is Cvent’s clearest advantage. Its supplier network and Passkey room block management have no real equivalent in Bizzabo. If your team sources venues or manages hotel blocks at scale, this alone can decide the comparison.

Cvent vs Bizzabo pricing: what you will actually pay

Bizzabo publishes a floor; Cvent publishes nothing. Neither number is the one you will pay.

Bizzabo lists $499 per user per month, billed annually, with a 3-user minimum, so the entry point is $17,999 a year. That includes unlimited events and registrations, the website builder, email campaigns, the mobile app and 24/7 support. It requires an annual subscription; you cannot buy it for one event. The paid add-ons are where quotes grow: martech and CRM integrations, sponsor and speaker portals, advanced networking, a custom-branded app, API access, SSO, private-label branding and Klik wearables.

Cvent is quote only. Its pricing page describes two editions. Professional lets you license only the modules you need and includes 15 user logins. Enterprise bundles Registration, Attendee Hub, OnArrival and Essentials with unlimited logins, API access, SSO and budget management. Venue sourcing, Passkey, LeadCapture, iCapture, Jifflenow, Surveys Premium, Webinar Premium and integrations are listed as extras, as are services like OnArrival 360 and Event Build.

Cost line to ask about	Cvent	Bizzabo
Platform licence	Quote, by edition and modules	From $17,999/yr (3 users)
Extra users	Professional includes 15 logins	$499 per user per month
CRM integrations	Integrations module; Integrations 360 service	Martech and CRM add-on
Onsite hardware and staff	OnArrival kit or OnArrival 360	Bizzabox rental, technicians, Klik
API and SSO	Enterprise edition	Add-ons
Build help	Implementation and Event Build services	Bizzabo Studios, professional services

Our advice from quoting both for clients: ask each vendor for a year-one quote that names every module, every service and every onsite cost for your actual event calendar. Compare that number, not the entry price. Then ask, in writing, what the year-two price will be.

Cvent vs Bizzabo implementation: the part comparison articles skip

The platform is only half the decision. The other half is who builds your events, and how long it takes before the first registration page goes live.

Bizzabo gives every customer a structured onboarding plan and a dedicated Event Success Specialist. Its own comparison page says new customers typically drive registration to their sites and apps within two months. A marketing coordinator can realistically own the platform day to day.

Cvent asks more of your team. Cvent runs formal training and certification through Cvent Academy, which tells you something about the depth. Teams without a dedicated Cvent operator usually buy implementation or event-build services, or work with a partner. The payoff is that once it is configured well, repeat events become templates and the operational control is hard to match.

What we see go wrong on each:

Cvent: registration paths built without a plan for attendee types, so every later change risks breaking something; Site Designer customisation that looks good on desktop and fails on mobile; integrations switched on before field mapping is agreed.
Bizzabo: add-ons discovered after signing, usually CRM sync or SSO; Klik ordered too late for international shipping; teams expecting Cvent-level approval workflows that are not there.

	Cvent	Bizzabo
Who can run it day to day	A trained operator, ideally certified	A marketing or events coordinator
Vendor onboarding	Implementation services, sold separately	Structured onboarding included
Time to first live event	Weeks, longer with integrations	Bizzabo cites about two months to drive registration
Support	24/7, 1,800+ client services team	24/7/365, dedicated success contact

Sponsors and exhibitors

Sponsors renew when they can see what they got. Both platforms help, in different ways.

Cvent sells several sponsor tools as separate modules: LeadCapture for exhibitor lead scanning, iCapture for trade-show lead qualification, Appointments for facilitated meetings, and Jifflenow for trade-show meeting scheduling. Exhibitor management is part of the Professional edition. This suits large trade shows with many exhibitors and formal meeting programmes.

Bizzabo includes lead management, sponsored sessions and app branding in the core plan, and sells a dedicated sponsor portal as an add-on. Its standout is Klik: exhibitors capture leads with a tap instead of a scanner, and organisers get booth-traffic data to show sponsors.

Sponsor need	Cvent	Bizzabo
Lead capture	LeadCapture and iCapture modules	Lead management included; Klik for tap capture
Sponsor self-service portal	Exhibitor management in Professional	Sponsor portal add-on
Scheduled sponsor meetings	Appointments, Jifflenow	Networking add-on
Proof of booth traffic	Scan and meeting data	Klik engagement heatmaps

AI features in 2026

Both vendors are moving quickly, so treat this as a snapshot and ask for a live demo of anything that matters to you.

Cvent launched CventIQ in June 2025, a set of 20+ AI features including AI-assisted venue RFP proposals, writing assistance for event content, personalised session recommendations, live session transcripts and feedback summaries. The Goldcast acquisition added AI repurposing of event video into clips and posts.
Bizzabo launched an organiser assistant, Event OS Copilot, in November 2024 and an attendee assistant, Bizzy, in April 2026, which answers attendee questions about sessions, speakers and logistics. Its matchmaking uses registration and engagement data.

The difference mirrors the platforms: Cvent applies AI across planning and sourcing, Bizzabo across the attendee experience.

Cvent vs Bizzabo security and compliance

Both meet the standard enterprise bar, which is what procurement will ask about first.

	Cvent	Bizzabo
SOC 2 Type II	Yes	Yes
ISO 27001	Yes	Yes
GDPR and CCPA	Yes	Yes
SSO	Enterprise edition	Add-on
Multi-factor authentication	Enterprise edition	Ask in your quote
Hosting	AWS, with regional data residency	AWS and Google Cloud

If you are in life sciences or another regulated industry, ask Cvent about its additional certifications and its Veeva integration; that is where Cvent has the edge.

Reliability

A platform outage during check-in is the most visible failure an event team can have. Bizzabo’s comparison page claims 99.99% uptime in the first half of 2025 and says Cvent had about seven weeks of partial outages or degraded performance in the same period, citing each vendor’s public status page. That is a competitor’s reading of Cvent’s status history, not an independent audit. Cvent’s scale is itself evidence its infrastructure has been tested at volume. Whichever you choose, ask both vendors for their uptime record and SLA in writing, and check their status pages for the months your events run.

Switching between Cvent and Bizzabo

Contacts, attendee history and past reports export from either platform. What does not move is the build: registration logic, website pages, email templates and integrations are rebuilt. Plan the switch between event seasons, run your first event on the new platform while the old one is still available for reporting, and allow time to remap CRM fields, which is where most switching problems surface.

Cvent vs Bizzabo: which should you choose?

Match the platform to how your events actually run, not to the longest feature list.

Your situation	Better fit	Why
50+ events a year across departments, with approvals and budgets	Cvent	Templates, approval workflows and budget management at scale
You source venues or manage hotel room blocks	Cvent	Supplier network and Passkey have no Bizzabo equivalent
A few flagship B2B conferences run by marketing	Bizzabo	Faster to build, strong networking, unlimited events on one subscription
Networking and sponsor leads are the main KPI	Bizzabo	Klik wearables capture interactions passively
Heavy Salesforce attribution and complex field mapping	Cvent	Longer, more mature integration list
Small team, short runway, no dedicated operator	Bizzabo	Shorter learning curve, onboarding included
Webinar programme alongside in-person events	Cvent, with a test	Broadest webinar line-up, but check how unified it feels
Under a few hundred attendees, a handful of events a year	Neither, probably	Both are priced and built for larger programmes

If you are already on one platform and frustrated, the problem is often the build, not the software. A registration path rebuilt properly or an integration remapped can fix what feels like a platform failure, at a fraction of the cost of switching.

Cvent vs Bizzabo FAQs

Is Bizzabo cheaper than Cvent? Bizzabo’s published entry price is $17,999 a year for three users, while Cvent quotes every deal. Once integrations, onsite hardware and services are added, the gap narrows and can reverse, so compare full year-one quotes.

Can I buy Bizzabo or Cvent for a single event? Bizzabo requires an annual subscription. Cvent licences are also annual, though Cvent offers Essentials for smaller, repeatable in-person events.

Which is easier to learn? Bizzabo. Cvent is deeper and more configurable, which is why it runs a formal certification programme.

Does Bizzabo do venue sourcing like Cvent? No. Bizzabo offers room block management but not a venue marketplace. Cvent’s supplier network and Passkey are its clearest advantage.

Which has better onsite check-in? Both are capable. Cvent’s OnArrival is a mature check-in and badging system; Bizzabo pairs its Onsite Command App with Bizzabox kits and Klik wearables. On both, speed at the door depends on how much hardware and staff you budget for.

Can I switch from Cvent to Bizzabo, or the other way? Yes, but plan it between event cycles. Contacts and past attendee data move easily; registration logic, website builds and integrations are rebuilt, not migrated.

Sources: Cvent pricing, Bizzabo pricing, Bizzabo: Cvent vs Bizzabo, ZoomInfo: Bizzabo vs Cvent.

Need help deciding?

We implement both platforms. If you are choosing between them, or stuck with a build that is not working, talk to our team and we will tell you which one fits your events, including when the honest answer is to stay where you are. See our Cvent expertise and Bizzabo expertise pages for what we build on each, or contact us.

Cvent vs Bizzabo (2026): An Implementation Partner’s Honest Comparison Read More »

Cvent vs RainFocus: which enterprise platform fits

Cvent vs RainFocus (2026): Which Enterprise Platform Fits?

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Cvent vs RainFocus: the short answer

Both are enterprise platforms, and both are expensive and complex. They are built for different shapes of enterprise programme.

Choose RainFocus if you run very large, content-heavy flagship events and multi-event programmes where attendee data, personalisation and cross-event journey tracking are the point. Think of global user conferences with thousands of sessions and deep marketing attribution. Docket describes it as built for teams running 50 or more events a year.

Choose Cvent if your programme spans many event types and departments, and you need venue sourcing, hotel room blocks, budget approvals and onsite operations in one system.

RainFocus was founded in 2014 and built from the ground up; Cvent was founded in 1999 and grew partly through acquisitions. Neither is a cost-saving move, and both expect a trained, often certified, admin team.

Cvent vs RainFocus at a glance

	Cvent	RainFocus
Founded	1999, Virginia	2014, Utah
Best fit	Enterprise programmes across many event types and departments	Very large, data-driven flagship and multi-event programmes
Signature strength	Venue sourcing, room blocks, onsite operations	Attendee data, personalisation, cross-event journey tracking
Pricing	Quote only; Docket estimates about $19.5k to $79k+ a year	Quote only; Docket reports about $50k to $200k+ a year
Implementation	Weeks to months	Docket estimates 6 to 12 weeks
G2 rating	4.3	4.6 (per Docket, 100+ reviews)
G2 ease of use	7.8	8.3 (per Swoogo, July 2026)
Venue sourcing	Yes, about 340,000 venues	No
Certification expected	Yes	Yes

Feature-by-feature

Data, personalisation and analytics

This is RainFocus’s reason to exist. It offers granular behaviour tracking, customisable real-time dashboards, detailed data segmentation and cross-event attendee journeys, which suits marketing teams that treat their flagship conference as a data source. Cvent offers real-time dashboards, session and engagement metrics, and post-event reporting; reviewers say custom reports have a learning curve. For deep attendee-level personalisation at very large scale, RainFocus is the specialist. If you want help getting more out of Cvent reporting, see our analytics and reporting services.

Registration and websites

RainFocus offers a drag-and-drop editor with high layout flexibility and built-in group workflows. Cvent offers templates, branding and complex multi-path logic. Reviewers of both say advanced options take time to master.

Venue sourcing and logistics

Cvent wins clearly: its supplier network, Passkey room blocks, event diagramming and budget approvals have no RainFocus equivalent.

Onsite

Both offer kiosk and self-service check-in and on-demand badge printing. Cvent’s OnArrival also offers a fully staffed option. Reviewers of each mention setup complexity at scale.

Sponsors and exhibitors

RainFocus provides sponsor dashboards, lead visibility and ROI tracking based on detailed attendee-sponsor behaviour data; per-exhibitor pricing may apply. Cvent provides exhibitor portals, booth selection and lead retrieval through LeadCapture and iCapture, often with device or per-exhibitor costs.

Virtual and hybrid

Both support in-person, virtual and hybrid. Cvent now has the broader webinar line-up after adding ON24 and Goldcast. Some RainFocus reviewers mention issues with virtual session access and streaming integrations.

Integrations and APIs

Cvent has a wide set of pre-built connectors, with fees on some and older SOAP APIs on some modules. RainFocus offers a REST API and deep data handling, but integration setup is described as complex and custom endpoints may cost extra.

Pricing

Neither publishes prices. Third-party estimates put RainFocus at the top of the market: Docket reports about $50,000 to $200,000 or more a year, depending on event volume and modules. Docket estimates Cvent licences at about $19,550 to $79,000 or more, with per-registrant fees and implementation on top. Both are reported to charge separately for some integrations and API access.

What to get in writing from both:

Line item	Why
Per-registration or per-registrant fees	Costs that scale with attendance
Mobile app, onsite check-in and badge hardware	Often separate lines
Lead retrieval and per-exhibitor fees	Can be large across a big show
Integration and API access fees	Reported for both
Term length, auto-renewal and annual escalators	Both are commonly multi-year
Event-day support package	May be extra

At this price level, the decision should rest on capability fit and total cost of ownership, including the staff time to run each platform.

AI features

Cvent’s CventIQ (June 2025) covers AI-assisted venue RFPs, writing help, session recommendations, transcripts and feedback summaries, and Goldcast adds AI video repurposing. RainFocus’s strength is data-driven personalisation; ask it to demonstrate its current AI features on your own data, as we found less public detail than for Cvent.

Security and compliance

Both serve large enterprises. Cvent holds SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and 27701, and PCI DSS, with SSO and MFA in its Enterprise edition. RainFocus offers SSO, MFA and audit logs; reviewers say advanced role setup can need vendor help. Ask RainFocus for its current certification reports before procurement.

Reliability

Neither publishes an uptime figure on the pages we reviewed. Accelevents notes that RainFocus shares uptime information mainly with enterprise customers. For a flagship event, ask both for uptime history, an SLA in the contract, and their event-day escalation path.

Switching between them

Both hold years of attendee history and configuration, which is what makes switching hard. Ask each what is exportable, in what format and how quickly. Rebuild time is significant on both: Docket estimates 6 to 12 weeks for a RainFocus implementation. Plan any move around your flagship event, never just before it.

Which should you choose?

Your situation	Better fit	Why
A global flagship conference with thousands of sessions and heavy personalisation	RainFocus	Data and personalisation depth
Many event types across departments	Cvent	Breadth and governance
Venue sourcing, hotel blocks and budgets	Cvent	No RainFocus equivalent
Marketing attribution across a multi-event journey	RainFocus	Cross-event attendee tracking
Webinar programme alongside in-person events	Cvent	ON24, Goldcast and Cvent Webinar
Budget under about $50,000 a year	Neither, probably	Look at Bizzabo, Swoogo or a Cvent Professional package

Frequently asked questions

Is RainFocus more expensive than Cvent? Third-party estimates put RainFocus higher, at about $50,000 to $200,000 or more a year. Get quotes on the same calendar.

Who uses RainFocus? Large enterprises running very large, data-rich conferences and multi-event programmes.

Does RainFocus do venue sourcing? No. That is one of Cvent’s clearest advantages.

Which is easier to use? RainFocus scores higher for ease of use on G2 (8.3 against Cvent’s 7.8, as published by Swoogo), but both are complex and expect trained admins.

How long does implementation take? Docket estimates 6 to 12 weeks for RainFocus; Cvent takes weeks to months depending on scope.

Sources: Cvent pricing, Accelevents: Cvent vs RainFocus.

Choosing an enterprise platform?

We build and integrate Cvent for enterprise programmes, including reporting and CRM data flows. Talk to our team. See our Cvent expertise and platform integration services, or contact us.

Cvent vs RainFocus (2026): Which Enterprise Platform Fits? Read More »

Cvent vs Stova: two enterprise suites compared

Cvent vs Stova (2026): Two Enterprise Suites Compared

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Cvent vs Stova: the short answer

Cvent and Stova are the two broadest enterprise event suites in this comparison set. Both cover registration, websites, apps, onsite and virtual. Cvent is larger and adds a venue-sourcing marketplace and hotel room blocks that Stova does not match. Stova is the choice for organisations already on Aventri or MeetingPlay, and for teams that want strong attendee engagement and social features without moving to Cvent.

What is Stova? Stova is the combined company formed from Aventri, MeetingPlay and eventcore. MeetingPlay and Aventri merged, and the business rebranded as Stova in 2022. If you are researching “Cvent vs Aventri”, this is the same comparison today.

Choose Cvent if venue sourcing, hotel blocks, budget approvals and deep CRM integration are central to your programme, and you have the people to run a complex platform. Choose Stova if you are already on Aventri or MeetingPlay, value mobile engagement and networking, or want a second enterprise quote to negotiate against.

Cvent vs Stova at a glance

	Cvent	Stova
Origins	Founded 1999; grew through acquisitions including Splash, Goldcast and ON24	Merger of Aventri, MeetingPlay and eventcore; Stova name since 2022
Best fit	Large enterprises, government, higher education, associations	Mid-size to large enterprises, agencies, Aventri and MeetingPlay customers
Pricing	Quote only; Professional and Enterprise editions	Quote only; no published figures
Venue sourcing and room blocks	Yes: supplier network and Passkey	Not at Cvent’s scale
Onsite	OnArrival kiosks, on-demand badges, session check-in	On-demand badge printing and check-in
Engagement	Attendee Hub app, gamification, networking	Strong social features: AI matchmaking, interactive feeds, community walls
Virtual	Attendee Hub, Cvent Studio, plus ON24 and Goldcast	Dedicated virtual event hub
G2 rating	4.3	4.3 (per Docket)
Learning curve	Steep; formal certification	Varies; users also report a learning curve

Feature-by-feature

Registration

Both support branded registration pages, custom fields, multiple attendee types and payments. Cvent goes further on approval workflows, housing and travel in the same path, and governance across many events. Reviewers of both report that complex setups take time; Stova users mention friction configuring group discounts and conditional workflows.

Onsite

Cvent’s OnArrival is mature: self-service kiosks, on-demand badges, session check-in with capacity control, and a fully staffed option. Stova offers on-demand badge printing and check-in; reviewers note performance can vary with event size and venue connectivity. For very large events, ask both for references at your scale. See our onsite solutions.

Engagement and the attendee app

This is Stova’s strongest area, inherited from MeetingPlay: AI matchmaking, interactive feeds and community walls. Cvent’s Attendee Hub offers personalised agendas, gamification and networking. Some Stova users report app performance issues at busy moments, so load-test before a flagship event.

Virtual and hybrid

Both run virtual and hybrid events. Cvent now has the broadest line-up after adding ON24 and Goldcast. Stova offers a dedicated virtual hub with modular features.

Venue sourcing

Cvent’s supplier network of roughly 340,000 venues and Passkey room-block management are its clearest advantage. Stova does not offer an equivalent marketplace.

Integrations

Both connect to Salesforce, HubSpot, Marketo and Eloqua. Cvent’s integration library is longer; some modules still use older SOAP APIs. Stova reviewers mention integrations that need manual configuration and documentation that could be better. On both, confirm which connectors are priced separately.

Sponsors and exhibitors

Cvent sells LeadCapture, iCapture, Appointments and Jifflenow as modules, often with per-device or per-exhibitor costs. Stova offers QR lead capture and exhibitor management; device and user limits can raise costs. Ask both for a sponsor-side quote, not just an organiser quote.

Pricing

Neither publishes prices. Both quote by modules and scale.

Cvent sells Professional and Enterprise editions, with modules such as venue sourcing, Passkey, lead capture, surveys and webinars as extras. Docket’s third-party research estimates typical annual licences at about $19,550 to $79,000 or more, with per-registrant Attendee Hub fees on top.

Stova quotes per programme. Swoogo, a competitor, states that Stova charges per registration, plus integration fees and penalties if you exceed your registration block. Accelevents says Stova may offer per-event pricing. We could not confirm either claim against Stova’s own materials, so treat both as questions to ask.

Ask both vendors	Why it matters
Is there a per-registration or per-registrant fee?	Fees that grow with attendance can surprise a successful programme
What happens if we exceed our registration block?	Overage penalties are reported for Stova and documented for Cvent contacts and emails
Which integrations cost extra?	Both are reported to charge for some connectors
What does onsite hardware and staffing cost per event?	Often the largest variable line
Can we sign one year, not three?	Both are commonly sold on multi-year terms

Because both are quote-only and similar in scope, they make good leverage against each other. Get both quotes on the same event calendar.

AI features

Cvent’s CventIQ (June 2025) covers AI-assisted venue RFPs, writing help, session recommendations, transcripts and feedback summaries. Stova’s AI is centred on attendee matchmaking. Ask Stova for its current AI roadmap; we found less public detail on it than on Cvent’s.

Security and compliance

	Cvent	Stova
SOC 2	Type II	Certified
ISO 27001	Yes	Ask
SSO and MFA	Enterprise edition	SSO available
Permission controls	Very granular	Less granular, per reviewers

Reliability

Both run large live programmes. Reviewers of each report occasional performance issues: Cvent with some virtual features, Stova with app performance during busy events. Ask both for uptime history, an SLA in the contract and live-event support contacts, and run a load test before your largest event.

Switching between them

The most common move is from Aventri or MeetingPlay to either Stova’s current platform or Cvent. Docket estimates 4 to 6 weeks for an enterprise Stova implementation. Whichever way you go, export attendee history, session data and exhibitor leads first; registration paths, websites and integrations are rebuilt. If you are an Aventri customer being migrated within Stova anyway, that is a natural moment to price Cvent alongside it.

Which should you choose?

Your situation	Better fit	Why
Venue sourcing and hotel blocks are central	Cvent	Supplier network and Passkey
Already on Aventri or MeetingPlay	Stova first, then compare	Lowest migration effort; price Cvent alongside
Networking and social engagement drive your events	Stova	MeetingPlay-era engagement features
Deep Salesforce attribution and governance	Cvent	Broader, more mature integrations and controls
Webinar-heavy programme	Cvent	ON24, Goldcast and Cvent Webinar in one group
Want leverage in negotiation	Quote both	Similar scope, both quote-only

Frequently asked questions

Is Stova the same as Aventri? Stova is the company formed from Aventri, MeetingPlay and eventcore; it adopted the Stova name in 2022.

Is Stova cheaper than Cvent? Neither publishes prices. Get quotes on the same event calendar and check for per-registration fees.

Does Stova offer venue sourcing like Cvent? Not at Cvent’s scale.

Which has the better attendee app? Stova is known for engagement and social features; Cvent’s Attendee Hub is broader. Load-test either before a flagship event.

Which is easier to learn? Both have a learning curve. Cvent’s is steeper and formalised through certification.

Sources: Cvent pricing, Accelevents: Stova vs Cvent.

Weighing an enterprise switch?

We build and integrate Cvent programmes for enterprise teams, including migrations from other platforms. Talk to our team. See our Cvent expertise and platform integration services, or contact us.

Cvent vs Stova (2026): Two Enterprise Suites Compared Read More »

Cvent vs Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet: virtual and hybrid compared

Cvent vs Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet (2026): Virtual and Hybrid Compared

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Cvent vs Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet: the short answer

Cvent vs Hubilo is no longer a straight fight between two virtual event platforms, because Hubilo has a new owner and Cvent has spent the past year buying video and webinar tools. This guide compares Cvent with Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet on what each does best, what it costs and what to check before you buy, from the point of view of an implementation partner.

Choose Cvent if virtual is one part of a wider programme that includes registration, onsite and hybrid events. Choose Airmeet if webinars and virtual events are the core job and you want a published starting price. Choose vFairs if you run virtual fairs or expos with booths. Treat Hubilo with extra due diligence: Brandlive announced its acquisition in September 2025, and the release does not say what happens to its event platform or customers.

Only Airmeet publishes a price. Cvent, vFairs and Hubilo all quote on request, so comparing them means writing the same brief for each.

Cvent vs Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet at a glance

Platform	Best for	Pricing	Notes
Cvent	Corporate and association programmes: registration, onsite, virtual and hybrid	Quote only	Owns ON24 and Goldcast
Airmeet	Webinars, virtual and hybrid events	Premium Webinars $167 a month billed yearly; Events plan on quote	Ticketing commission 4% on Premium Webinars, 2% on Events
vFairs	Virtual fairs and expos with booths	Custom quote; annual licence available	Project manager included
Hubilo	Hosted event app and virtual lobby	Custom quote	Acquired by Brandlive, announced September 2025

What changed: Cvent and Hubilo both have new owners

Cvent bought Goldcast, an AI video platform, in December 2025 and closed its roughly $400 million acquisition of ON24 on 1 April 2026. ON24 now operates as a wholly owned Cvent company. The result is a single vendor with registration, onsite, webinars and video.

Brandlive, an enterprise video platform for town halls and webinars, announced it was acquiring Hubilo in September 2025. It described the deal as its fifth acquisition in 18 months and said it gained a 30-person R&D hub in Bengaluru. The release talks about new AI tools for Brandlive customers and does not say what happens to Hubilo’s event platform or existing customers. If you are on Hubilo or considering it, ask in writing about the product roadmap, support and contract terms.

Cvent vs Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet: feature by feature

Registration and ticketing

Cvent’s registration is the deepest of the group, with approvals, multiple attendee types and CRM sync, and it is licensed as a separate module. Airmeet supports ticketing with a commission of 4% on Premium Webinars, 2% on Events and 0% on Managed Events. vFairs lists Stripe, PayPal and Authorize.net among its payment gateways. Hubilo says registration and ticketing on its own domain carry no extra charge.

Virtual and hybrid experience

Airmeet covers live, simulive and on-demand webinars on its Premium Webinars plan, and adds in-person, virtual and hybrid events, multi-track sessions and a customer success manager on Events. vFairs builds virtual fairs and expos, with extras for sessions, booths and accessibility features. Cvent’s Attendee Hub and webinar tools, now joined by ON24 and Goldcast, cover virtual and hybrid within the Cvent ecosystem.

Onsite and in-person

Cvent’s OnArrival is mature: self-service kiosks, on-demand badges and session check-in with capacity control. Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet are strongest on the virtual side, so if the in-person half of your hybrid event is large, ask each of them for a demo of onsite check-in.

AI, analytics and integrations

Cvent’s recent purchases point to AI video and webinar content, including ON24’s content engine, which turns recordings into blog posts, clips and follow-up emails. Brandlive plans AI tools for video production, analytics and audience segmentation, and Airmeet lists CRM integrations on its Premium Webinars plan. In every case, ask for a demo that uses your own data and CRM.

Cvent vs Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet pricing

Airmeet is the only one with a list price. Premium Webinars is $167 a month billed yearly ($199 monthly) for two team seats, up to 150 events a year and 100 to 10,000 attendees per webinar. The Events plan is a custom quote with a free trial, and Managed Events, where Airmeet staff run the event, start at $4,999 for brand conferences. Airmeet prices by attendee limits and bills overage afterwards.

vFairs prices each event or annual licence to the brief, with add-ons for extra sessions, booths, attendees and managed services, and a dedicated project manager on every plan. Hubilo quotes custom packages, bills the app upfront and keeps the platform active for one year after the invoice. Cvent licenses modules separately, so a virtual-only quote can look low until registration and Attendee Hub are added.

How to compare quotes fairly

Send each vendor the same brief: number of events, attendees per event, live versus on-demand, ticketing, number of exhibitors, languages, integrations and whether any part is in person. Ask what happens to the price if attendance beats forecast, how long recordings stay available, and who owns the attendee data when the contract ends.

Implementation, support and security

Cvent projects can be large because they touch registration, CRM, approvals and onsite, and many teams use an implementation partner. vFairs includes a dedicated project manager, Airmeet’s Events plan includes a customer success manager, and Hubilo assigns an account manager who agrees any custom development costs in advance. Ask each vendor for security documentation and data residency terms early.

Which should you choose?

Choose Cvent if virtual is one part of a bigger programme and you want registration, onsite, webinars and video from one vendor.
Choose Airmeet if webinars and virtual events are the main job and you want a published starting price.
Choose vFairs if you run virtual or hybrid fairs and expos with many booths.
Choose Hubilo only after written answers on ownership, roadmap and support, given the Brandlive acquisition.

FAQ

Is Hubilo still operating? Brandlive announced the acquisition in September 2025, and Hubilo’s pricing page still takes quote requests. The release does not say what happens to Hubilo’s event platform, so ask the vendor directly.

Does Airmeet publish pricing? Yes, for Premium Webinars at $167 a month billed yearly. Events and Managed Events are quoted; Managed Events start at $4,999 for brand conferences.

Who owns ON24 now? Cvent. It closed the roughly $400 million deal on 1 April 2026, and ON24 now operates as a wholly owned Cvent company.

Is vFairs a good fit for virtual fairs? vFairs builds virtual fairs and expos with booths, and says its pricing is tailored to each event. Ask for references from events of your size.

Can Cvent replace a virtual event platform? For many corporate programmes, yes. Attendee Hub covers the mobile app, networking and live or on-demand video, and ON24 and Goldcast add webinars and AI video. Test it against your own agenda and audience size.

Which is cheapest? Only Airmeet publishes a price, so ask the others to quote the same scenario before you compare.

Need help choosing or setting up?

AttendeeGain implements Cvent and works with Bizzabo, Swoogo, Whova and Splash. Tell us your event size and format and we will tell you which platform fits and what it will take to run it. See our Cvent expertise or contact us. For hybrid events with a large in-person side, see onsite solutions.

Sources: Airmeet pricing, vFairs pricing, Hubilo pricing, Brandlive press release on Hubilo, Cvent pricing.

Cvent vs Hubilo, vFairs and Airmeet (2026): Virtual and Hybrid Compared Read More »

Bizzabo vs Eventbrite: licence or ticket fees

Bizzabo vs Eventbrite (2026): Licence or Ticket Fees?

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Bizzabo vs Eventbrite: the short answer

Bizzabo vs Eventbrite is a choice between a platform you license by the seat and a ticket shop you pay for per sale. Bizzabo is an event experience platform for flagship conferences. Eventbrite is a ticketing and discovery tool for public events. This comparison is written from the point of view of an implementation partner that builds on Bizzabo.

Choose Bizzabo if you run conferences where networking, sponsor leads and attendee data matter, and you will run several events a year on one annual licence. Choose Eventbrite if you sell tickets to the public, want to be live today and do not want a contract.

The two are priced differently, not just at different levels. Bizzabo charges $499 per user per month, billed annually, with a three-user minimum, which is $17,999 a year before add-ons. Eventbrite charges 3.7% + $1.79 per paid ticket plus 2.9% processing, and nothing for free events.

Bizzabo vs Eventbrite at a glance

	Bizzabo	Eventbrite
Built for	Flagship B2B conferences and event programmes	Public ticketed events and community events
Pricing model	Annual licence, per user	Per paid ticket; free events cost nothing
Published price	$499 per user a month, 3-user minimum ($17,999 a year)	3.7% + $1.79 per ticket plus 2.9% processing
Contract	Annual subscription only	No contract
Events and registrations	Unlimited on the licence	Unlimited free events; fees on paid tickets
Mobile app	Included; custom-branded app is an add-on	Organiser app and check-in app
Onsite networking	Klik SmartBadge wearables, quoted separately	Not featured
Marketplace discovery	No	Yes

Bizzabo vs Eventbrite: feature by feature

Registration and ticketing

Eventbrite is fast: set up an event, publish and sell, with fees paid by the buyer by default. It also sells through its own marketplace. Bizzabo gives you contact management, ticketing, advanced registration flows, branding and an event website builder on one licence, which matters when you need custom forms, several attendee types or white-labelled pages.

Event app and attendee engagement

Bizzabo includes a mobile app and sells networking, a speaker portal, Sponsor ROI and a custom-branded app as premium add-ons. Eventbrite’s event-management page describes an organiser app for ticket sales and attendance, and does not describe an attendee agenda or networking app. If attendees need a session agenda and a way to meet each other, plan for Bizzabo or another platform.

Onsite check-in and badging

Bizzabo’s Klik SmartBadge adds branded wearable badges with networking, lead capture and passive attendee tracking. It is quoted per event and can be bought without an Event Experience OS subscription. Eventbrite offers a check-in app and an app marketplace; check whether the badge printing and lead capture you need are available there.

Marketing and discovery

Eventbrite lists your event on its marketplace and includes email marketing, social ads in select markets and more than 100 integrations such as Salesforce, Mailchimp and HubSpot. Bizzabo includes email campaigns but does not bring buyers to you, so your own promotion drives registrations.

Integrations, reporting and security

Bizzabo lists martech and CRM integrations (HubSpot, Marketo, Salesforce MCAE and Eloqua) as a paid add-on, with API access, SSO and a corporate IP address also priced separately. Eventbrite offers customisable sales reporting and real-time analytics. If CRM-led reporting and single sign-on matter, price the Bizzabo add-ons before you compare.

Bizzabo vs Eventbrite pricing in 2026

Bizzabo’s Event Experience OS costs $499 per user a month, billed annually, with a minimum of three users, so the starting price is $17,999 a year. It includes unlimited events and registrations. Klik SmartBadge, virtual production, onsite services and the premium add-ons are quoted separately, and Bizzabo sells annual subscriptions only.

Eventbrite charges nothing for free events and has no subscription for paid ones. On paid tickets the service fee is 3.7% + $1.79 and card processing is 2.9%, which comes to $5.09 on a $50 ticket, $8.39 on $100 and $14.99 on $200. Buyers pay by default.

What the break-even tells you

On a $100 ticket, Eventbrite’s fees reach Bizzabo’s $17,999 base licence at about 2,145 paid tickets a year. At $200 that happens at about 1,201 tickets, and at $50 at about 3,536. Below those volumes Eventbrite is cheaper in fees alone; above them, the licence starts to pay for itself. This is a fee comparison only. If you pass the fees to buyers, your own cost on Eventbrite is lower still, and Bizzabo’s base excludes add-ons.

Implementation, support and security

Eventbrite is self-serve, so you can be live the same day. Bizzabo includes curated onboarding and tiered support, lists 24/7/365 support, and offers professional services for onsite check-in, Bizzabox rental and virtual production at variable prices. The licence is only part of a Bizzabo project: budget time for registration logic, integrations and the onsite plan.

Which should you choose?

Choose Bizzabo if networking, sponsor leads and attendee data are central to your events and you run several a year.
Choose Eventbrite if you sell tickets to the public, run few paid events or low-priced tickets, and want no contract.
Run both only if you have a clear split, for example Bizzabo for flagship conferences and Eventbrite for community meetups. Two systems mean two data sets to reconcile.
If you need Cvent-style venue sourcing, approvals and enterprise reporting, neither fits. See our Cvent expertise.

FAQ

Is Bizzabo more expensive than Eventbrite? On a licence basis, yes: Bizzabo starts at $17,999 a year, while Eventbrite has no subscription. On fees alone, Eventbrite costs more per paid ticket and overtakes the Bizzabo base licence at roughly 1,200 to 3,500 paid tickets a year, depending on ticket price.

Does Bizzabo sell tickets? Yes. Its platform includes ticketing and registration, with unlimited events and registrations on the licence.

Does Eventbrite have an attendee app? It has an organiser mobile app and a check-in app. Its event-management page does not describe an attendee networking or agenda app.

Can Bizzabo be bought for a single event? No. Bizzabo says it requires an annual subscription and does not sell single-event access, although Klik SmartBadge has single-event and multi-event pricing.

Which is better for a conference? Bizzabo, if the conference needs an app, networking, sponsor data and custom registration. Eventbrite works for a simple public conference with few sessions.

Can I switch from Eventbrite to Bizzabo? Yes. Export your attendee data, rebuild registration and ticket types in Bizzabo, and plan the switch between events, not during an open sale.

Need help choosing or setting up?

AttendeeGain implements Cvent and works with Bizzabo, Swoogo, Whova and Splash. Tell us your event size and volume and we will tell you which platform fits and what it will take to run it. See our Bizzabo expertise and Cvent expertise, or contact us. For onsite check-in and badging, see onsite solutions.

Sources: Bizzabo pricing, Eventbrite pricing, Eventbrite event management.

Bizzabo vs Eventbrite (2026): Licence or Ticket Fees? Read More »

Cvent vs Zoho Backstage, Eventtia and Dreamcast compared

Cvent vs Zoho Backstage, Eventtia and Dreamcast (2026)

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Cvent vs Zoho Backstage, Eventtia and Dreamcast: the short answer

Cvent vs Zoho Backstage is a comparison between an enterprise event suite and a lighter platform that starts free. This guide also covers Eventtia and Dreamcast, two mid-market and regional options, and compares what each does, what it costs and what you give up, from the point of view of an implementation partner.

Choose Cvent for large corporate or association programmes with approvals, venue sourcing and cross-event reporting. Choose Zoho Backstage for small to mid-size events, especially if your team already uses Zoho. Choose Eventtia if you want a published yearly licence for registration, apps and networking at mid-market scale. Choose Dreamcast if your events are in India or the UAE and check-in at scale matters.

Zoho Backstage has a free plan and published plan limits, and Eventtia publishes its yearly licences. Cvent and Dreamcast quote on request.

Cvent vs Zoho Backstage, Eventtia and Dreamcast at a glance

Platform	Best for	Pricing	Notes
Cvent	Enterprise event programmes	Quote only	Venue sourcing, approvals and OnArrival onsite tools
Zoho Backstage	Small to mid-size events, teams on Zoho	Free plan to 100 attendees; Essentials, Premium and Ultimate paid plans	0% ticket commission on paid plans
Eventtia	Mid-market events and B2B networking	$1,650 to $3,500 a year; Enterprise usually above $12,000	No per-ticket fees; implementation and support included
Dreamcast	Events in India and the UAE	Quote only	No commission on sign-up revenue

Cvent vs Zoho Backstage, Eventtia and Dreamcast: feature by feature

Registration and ticketing

Cvent’s registration module handles approvals, multiple attendee types, hotel blocks and CRM sync, and is licensed on its own. Zoho Backstage’s paid plans list 0% commission ticketing, and the free plan includes a website builder, RSVP management, check-in and badging. Eventtia’s plans include online registration and payments with no per-ticket fees. Dreamcast offers multi-tier tickets, approval-based and invite-only registration, and RSVP quotas.

Event app and engagement

Zoho Backstage includes mobile apps from the free plan, networking lounges from Essentials and AI-powered matchmaking from Premium, and Ultimate adds a white-labelled attendee app. Eventtia adds a branded mobile app and a virtual stage on Premium, and matchmaking and one-to-one meeting scheduling on Networking. Cvent’s Attendee Hub covers the app, networking, chat, polling and video.

Onsite and check-in

Cvent’s OnArrival covers self-service kiosks, on-demand badges and session check-in with capacity control. Dreamcast lists fast check-in with badge printing, RFID, QR and facial recognition, self-service kiosks and turnstile access control, and claims 10-second check-ins, which is its own figure and not independently verified. Zoho’s free plan includes check-in and badging, and Eventtia’s Essential plan includes onsite check-in.

Scale and limits

Zoho Backstage limits attendees per event by plan: 100 on Free, 200 on Essentials, 1,000 on Premium and 5,000 on Ultimate, with more available as add-ons, and larger events go to sales. Eventtia’s licences work on credits, one per registration and valid for 12 months, with Enterprise for unlimited attendees. Cvent has no such ceilings, but you pay for modules. If your events run to several thousand attendees, check the limits first.

Integrations, security and AI

Zoho Backstage’s Premium plan adds webhooks, and as a Zoho product it fits the wider Zoho suite. Eventtia’s Enterprise plan adds SSO, role-based access, white label and unlimited API calls, and every Eventtia plan includes an MCP server that connects AI assistants such as Claude and ChatGPT. Cvent is known for deep CRM and reporting integrations. Dreamcast includes WhatsApp and email automation and an event CRM.

Cvent vs Zoho Backstage, Eventtia and Dreamcast pricing

Eventtia publishes four plans on a 12-month licence: Essential at $1,650 for 250 attendees and one admin seat, Premium at $2,500 with two seats, Networking at $3,500 with three seats, and Enterprise usually above $12,000 with unlimited attendees, licensed per admin user. There are no per-ticket fees, and implementation and support are included.

Zoho Backstage has a free plan for up to 100 attendees per event, and Essentials, Premium and Ultimate plans for larger events, with monthly or yearly billing (yearly saves 17%) and a pay-per-event option. Check its live pricing page for current amounts, because add-ons such as extra attendees and exhibitors are priced separately. Dreamcast shows no prices and says you keep 100% of sign-up revenue. Cvent is quote only, with Registration, Attendee Hub and OnArrival licensed as separate modules.

How to compare quotes fairly

Set one scenario and price it everywhere: events per year, attendees per event, paid or free registration, mobile app, onsite check-in and integrations. Watch for per-attendee add-ons at Zoho, credit top-ups at Eventtia, and hardware and staffing at Dreamcast and Cvent.

Implementation, support and compliance

Eventtia includes implementation, support and version upgrades in every plan, and Zoho’s Ultimate plan adds a dedicated event success manager. Dreamcast works with enterprises and agencies on expos, MICE and government events across India and the UAE, and supports UIDAI-based verification at registration. Cvent projects often use an implementation partner, which is what we do. Whatever you pick, ask for data residency, SSO and security documents early.

Which should you choose?

Choose Cvent for enterprise programmes with approvals, hotel blocks, venue sourcing and cross-event reporting.
Choose Zoho Backstage for small to mid-size events and teams already on Zoho, starting free.
Choose Eventtia for a published yearly licence at mid-market scale, with an app, networking and no per-ticket fees.
Choose Dreamcast for events in India or the UAE where check-in speed, RFID or facial recognition and WhatsApp communication matter.

FAQ

Is Zoho Backstage free? It has a free plan for up to 100 attendees per event, with a website builder, RSVP management, check-in and badging, webcasting and mobile apps. Paid plans raise the limits and add features.

How much does Eventtia cost? $1,650 a year for Essential (250 attendees, one admin seat), $2,500 for Premium and $3,500 for Networking. Enterprise is usually above $12,000 a year.

Does Dreamcast publish pricing? No. Its site links to a pricing section without listing prices, and says you keep 100% of sign-up revenue with no commissions.

Can Zoho Backstage replace Cvent? For small and mid-size events, often. For venue sourcing, approvals and multi-event reporting at enterprise scale, Cvent covers more.

Where is Dreamcast based? India, with a UAE location.

Which is cheapest? Zoho Backstage’s free plan costs nothing for events up to 100 attendees. Above that, Eventtia’s published licences are the clearest to budget for.

Need help choosing or setting up?

AttendeeGain implements Cvent and works with Bizzabo, Swoogo, Whova and Splash. Tell us your event size and region and we will tell you which platform fits and what it will take to run it. See our Cvent expertise or contact us. For onsite check-in and badging, see onsite solutions.

Sources: Zoho Backstage pricing, Eventtia pricing, Dreamcast, Cvent pricing.

Cvent vs Zoho Backstage, Eventtia and Dreamcast (2026) Read More »

Swoogo vs Stova: pricing, features and fit

Swoogo vs Stova (2026): Pricing, Features and Fit

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Swoogo vs Stova: the short answer

Swoogo vs Stova is a choice between a registration-first platform with a published price and a broad enterprise suite sold by quote. Eventbrite often turns up on the same shortlist, so this guide covers it too. It is written from the point of view of an implementation partner that builds on Swoogo.

Choose Swoogo if registration is the hard part of your events (branching forms, approvals, many events) and you want a price you can budget. Choose Stova if you want registration, mobile app, virtual, onsite and venue sourcing from one enterprise vendor, or you already run on Aventri or MeetingPlay. Choose Eventbrite only if you are selling tickets to the public.

Swoogo starts at $11,800 a year for its Professional plan. Stova’s packages page lists no prices. Eventbrite charges 3.7% + $1.79 per paid ticket plus 2.9% processing, and nothing for free events.

Swoogo vs Stova at a glance

	Swoogo	Stova	Eventbrite
Built for	Registration-heavy corporate and association events	Enterprise suites, sales kickoffs, trade shows and conferences	Public ticketed events
Published price	$11,800 a year (Professional)	Quote only	3.7% + $1.79 per paid ticket plus 2.9%
Events	Unlimited events and registrations	Package-based	Unlimited
Mobile app	Paid add-on	Module, by quote	Organiser app only
Onsite	Check-in app included; Go Onsite Pro add-on	Kiosks, badge printing, access control, onsite staff	Check-in app
Venue sourcing	Not offered	Yes, within strategic meetings management	Not offered
Integrations	30+ included, plus REST API and webhooks	By quote	App marketplace with 100+ apps

What is Stova?

Stova is the combined company formed from Aventri, MeetingPlay and eventcore. MeetingPlay and Aventri merged and the business rebranded as Stova in 2022, so searches for “Swoogo vs Aventri” lead to the same comparison today. Its platform groups modules into Plan, Engage, Experience and Measure, and Stova says more than 700 organisations use it.

Swoogo vs Stova: feature by feature

Registration

Swoogo’s Professional plan includes branching forms, attendee approval workflows and automated workflows, and Enterprise adds unlimited visibility rules and multi-level conditional logic. Stova puts registration in its Plan stage alongside session and speaker management and an exhibitor resource centre. If your registration forms are complicated, test Swoogo’s form logic first.

Mobile app and engagement

Stova’s mobile app covers live agendas, speaker bios, venue maps, in-app networking, QR scanning, live polling, session ratings, gamification and push notifications, and its virtual tools include lounges, breakout rooms and live streaming. Swoogo’s Go Attend lets full users build mobile event apps, but the Mobile Event Apps product is a paid add-on. If the app is central to your event, Stova describes more app and virtual capability.

Onsite check-in

Swoogo includes a check-in app and sells Go Onsite Pro for advanced check-in. Stova lists check-in kiosks, badge printing, access control, session scanning, lead retrieval and onsite support staff with hardware setup.

Integrations and security

Swoogo includes 30+ integrations with no integration fees, plus a REST API and outbound webhooks. Enterprise adds SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI and GDPR compliance, SSO and MFA, and a 99.9% uptime SLA. Stova’s home page does not list its security details, so ask for them during evaluation.

Swoogo vs Stova vs Eventbrite pricing in 2026

Swoogo Professional is $11,800 a year and includes one full user and one reporting user, unlimited events and registrations, a check-in app, 30+ integrations and one custom domain. Enterprise is quote only. Mobile apps, Go Onsite Pro, premium support, extra domains and SSO are paid add-ons with no published prices, and extra users are priced on request.

Stova does not publish prices: its packages page asks for a demo or consultation. Eventbrite charges 3.7% + $1.79 per paid ticket plus 2.9% processing and has no subscription for paid events, which makes it cheap for a few events and expensive at volume or low ticket prices.

How to compare them fairly

Give Swoogo and Stova the same brief: events per year, attendees, the users who will build and report, integrations, mobile app and onsite needs. Ask Swoogo for the price at your team size with add-ons itemised in writing, and ask Stova for an itemised package. Compare total cost over the contract, not the headline.

Implementation, support and ownership

Swoogo Enterprise adds a customer success manager, premium support and personalised onboarding. Stova’s site lists a leadership team and an office in Bluffdale, Utah, but does not say who owns the company, so ask about ownership and roadmap as you would with any vendor that has merged brands. Whichever platform you choose, plan time for registration logic and integrations.

Which should you choose?

Choose Swoogo if registration is the hard part, you want a published price and your team will build its own sites.
Choose Stova if you want one enterprise vendor for registration, app, virtual, onsite and venue sourcing, or you already use Aventri or MeetingPlay.
Choose Eventbrite if you sell public tickets and need to be live today with no contract.
If you need Cvent-style approvals, hotel blocks and enterprise reporting, compare Cvent too. See our Cvent expertise.

FAQ

Is Stova the same as Aventri? Stova is the company formed when Aventri and MeetingPlay merged and rebranded in 2022, so the two names point to the same platform family today.

How much does Swoogo cost? Professional is $11,800 a year with one full user and one reporting user. Enterprise is by quote, and add-ons are not priced publicly.

Does Stova publish pricing? No. Its packages page asks for a demo or consultation.

Which is better for registration? Swoogo is built around registration logic and is the safer pick if forms and approvals are complicated. Stova covers registration within a larger suite.

Is Eventbrite a Swoogo or Stova alternative? Only for public ticketing. For corporate registration with approvals, several attendee types and CRM sync, Eventbrite is a different category.

Can I move from Eventbrite to Swoogo? Yes. Move between events, not during an open sale, and rebuild your registration logic rather than copying it.

Need help choosing or setting up?

AttendeeGain implements Cvent and works with Bizzabo, Swoogo, Whova and Splash. Tell us your event size and volume and we will tell you which platform fits and what it will take to run it. See our Swoogo expertise and Cvent expertise, or contact us.

Sources: Swoogo pricing, Stova, Eventbrite pricing.

Swoogo vs Stova (2026): Pricing, Features and Fit Read More »

Eventbrite alternatives: nine options compared by fees and features

Eventbrite Alternatives (2026): 9 Options Compared by Cost and Fit

Event Marketing / By Nitish Verma

Eventbrite alternatives: the short answer

The best Eventbrite alternatives depend on why you are leaving. If it is the fees, look at Luma, Humanitix, Tito or Ticket Tailor. If you have outgrown ticketing, look at Swoogo, Bizzabo or Cvent. This guide compares nine options on what they charge, what they do better and what you give up, written from the point of view of an event technology implementation partner.

Eventbrite charges 3.7% plus $1.79 per paid ticket, plus 2.9% payment processing, and publishing free events costs nothing. The fixed $1.79 is what hurts: on a $20 ticket the fees come to $3.11, or about 15.6%. Eventbrite changed owner in 2026, when Bending Spoons completed its acquisition in March, but the published per-ticket fee did not change.

Choose by the event, not by the lowest fee. A free community meetup, a paid workshop and a 2,000-person conference need different tools.

Eventbrite alternatives at a glance

Platform	Best for	Published price
Luma	Communities, meetups and small paid events	Free plan with 5% on paid tickets; Plus $59 a month billed annually, 0% fee
Humanitix	Public events where low fees matter	2.1% + $0.99 per paid ticket (1% + $0.99 for charities and schools)
Tito	Conferences that want a simple ticket shop	3% per ticket, capped at €25 (2.5% for community and non-profit events)
Ticket Tailor	Independent organisers who want no subscription	£0.60 per ticket pay as you go, from £0.22 prepaid
Eventzilla	Registration with extra attendee management	Basic $1.50 per registration; Pro 1.9% + $1.50; Plus 2.9% + $1.50
Posh	Nightlife, comedy and culture events	10% + $0.99 per paid ticket (Posh’s own figure)
Swoogo	Corporate registration with complex forms	From $11,800 a year
Bizzabo	Flagship conferences and networking	From $17,999 a year (3 users)
Cvent	Enterprise event programmes	Quote only

Prices are the vendors’ own, checked in November 2026. Posh’s rate comes from Posh’s own article, and Ticket Tailor’s US page showed prices in pounds.

How Eventbrite’s fees work, and when they hurt

Eventbrite splits its charge into a service fee of 3.7% plus $1.79 per paid ticket and payment processing of 2.9%. Buyers pay by default, and you can absorb the fees instead. Free events cost nothing, and you do not need a subscription to sell paid tickets. Optional Pro plans run from $15 to $100 a month and add email volume and advanced features.

Because $1.79 is a flat amount, the effective rate falls as the ticket price rises. Worked out from the published rates, the all-in fee is $3.11 on a $20 ticket (about 15.6%), $4.43 on $40 (11.1%), $6.74 on $75 (9.0%) and $8.39 on $100 (8.4%). If your tickets cost less than about $30, the fee structure is the main reason to look elsewhere.

Eventbrite alternatives in detail

Here is what each option does, in the order we would try them for a public ticketed event.

Luma

Luma’s free plan covers unlimited events and guests, up to 500 invites or newsletters a week and a 5% platform fee on paid events. Plus costs $59 a month billed annually, drops the platform fee to 0% and adds API access, Zapier, tax collection on ticket sales and up to 5,000 invites a week. Stripe’s card fee (typically 2.9% + 30 cents) applies on top of either plan.

It suits communities, meetups and small paid events. If you need multi-day agendas, approvals or badge printing, check carefully before you commit.

Humanitix

Humanitix charges 2.1% + $0.99 per paid ticket in the US, or 1% + $0.99 for charities and schools, and free events cost nothing. Card processing of 2.9% + $0.30 is listed on the paid plans. It says all of its profits go to charities that provide education, healthcare and basic necessities, which can be a selling point for your attendees.

Tito

Tito charges 3% per ticket (2.5% for charity, community and non-profit events), capped at €25 a ticket, with no setup fee or subscription. Payments go straight from Stripe or PayPal to your bank, so Tito never holds your money. Stripe’s own fees are charged separately. It fits conferences that want a simple ticket shop and reporting rather than a full event platform.

Ticket Tailor

Ticket Tailor has no subscription. You pay £0.60 per ticket as you go, or from £0.22 per ticket with prepaid credits (minimum 100 credits). Up to 5,000 free tickets a year carry no fee, although its FAQ gives a lower threshold of 2,000, so confirm which applies. Registered charities and not-for-profits get 50% off. Its US page showed prices in pounds, so confirm the dollar amount at checkout. Stripe processing in the US is listed at 2.9% + $0.30.

Eventzilla

Eventzilla’s Basic plan charges $1.50 per registration, Pro charges 1.9% + $1.50 and Plus charges 2.9% + $1.50, with a custom Scale plan for volume. Its own payment service adds 2.9% + $0.99 per transaction. Extras include Event Hub at $0.99 per registered attendee, done-for-you setup from $499 an event and a webinars add-on from $11.99 a month. Nonprofits get 25% off the platform fee.

Posh

Posh’s own article puts its fee at 10% + $0.99 per paid ticket and says it bundles free SMS to past attendees, instant payouts and a promoter programme called Kickbacks. It positions itself for nightlife, comedy, supper clubs and culture events. Treat its comparisons with care: the Eventbrite fees quoted in that article differ from the ones on Eventbrite’s own pricing page.

Swoogo, Bizzabo and Cvent: when ticketing is not enough

If you are selling registrations for corporate or association events rather than tickets to the public, the real alternatives are event management platforms. Swoogo starts at $11,800 a year and handles complex registration for unlimited events. Bizzabo starts at $17,999 a year (three users) and puts its depth into onsite networking and sponsor data. Cvent is quote-only and adds venue sourcing, approvals and enterprise reporting. We implement all three; see our Swoogo expertise, Bizzabo expertise and Cvent expertise pages.

What you lose by leaving Eventbrite

Eventbrite is a marketplace as well as a ticket shop, with built-in email marketing, social ads in select markets and an app marketplace with more than 100 integrations. Check where your sales come from before you move. If most buyers arrive from your own email list and social posts, a ticket shop with lower fees loses you little. If a share arrives through Eventbrite search, run one event on the new tool before moving everything.

Which Eventbrite alternative should you choose?

Choose Luma for communities, meetups and small events where a clean page and invites matter.
Choose Humanitix if you want low fees on public events and like the charity angle.
Choose Ticket Tailor if you want no subscription and predictable per-ticket pricing.
Choose Tito for a simple conference ticket shop with a capped percentage fee.
Choose Eventzilla if you want registration features and add-ons such as an event hub.
Choose Posh for nightlife, comedy and culture-led events.
Choose Swoogo, Bizzabo or Cvent when registration forms, approvals, sessions and reporting matter more than ticket fees.

FAQ

What is the cheapest Eventbrite alternative? On a $25 ticket, Luma Plus (about $1.03, plus its $59 monthly plan), Tito ($1.78) and Luma Free ($2.28) cost least, against $3.44 on Eventbrite. The ranking changes with ticket price and volume, so work it out for your own average ticket.

Does Eventbrite charge for free events? No. Publishing free events costs nothing.

Did Eventbrite’s fees change after the acquisition? Not the per-ticket fee. The service fee is still 3.7% + $1.79 per paid ticket plus 2.9% processing. TickPick, a competitor, reported in July 2026 that the old Flex plan was retired and Pro plans now run $15 to $100 a month.

Can I avoid ticket fees entirely? You can pass fees to buyers on most platforms, and Eventbrite charges buyers by default. Luma Plus removes its platform fee, but card processing still applies.

Which Eventbrite alternative is best for conferences? Tito suits simple conference ticketing. For conferences with sessions, sponsors and attendee data, look at Swoogo, Bizzabo or Cvent.

Can I move events from Eventbrite? Yes, but moving an event mid-sale is rarely worth it. Export your attendee list, start your next event on the new tool and tell past attendees where to find it.

Need help choosing or setting up?

AttendeeGain implements Cvent and works with Bizzabo, Swoogo, Whova and Splash. Tell us your event type and ticket volume and we will tell you which platform fits and what it will take to run it. See our Cvent expertise, Swoogo expertise and Bizzabo expertise, or contact us.

Sources: Eventbrite pricing, Luma pricing, Humanitix pricing, Tito pricing, Ticket Tailor pricing, Eventzilla pricing, TickPick on Eventbrite’s 2026 changes, Posh, Swoogo pricing, Bizzabo pricing.

Eventbrite Alternatives (2026): 9 Options Compared by Cost and Fit Read More »